Phone 020 8869 7400
 
Parkhill
Search
   
OUR SERVICES
Internal Audit Services
Counter Fraud Services
IT Audit Services
Health & Safety Support
Security Management Services
Professional Training Services
Digital Forensic Services
Policy & Procedure Services
Specialist Consultancy
Executive Resourcing
Parkhill
About Us Key Disciplines Our Clients Library Careers News Conatact Us
News >> Industry News
Industry News

Fears over staff vetting and barring scheme 21.01.2010
News Source:  The Health Service Journal

A registration scheme to protect vulnerable people will force managers to make moral judgements about people’s lifestyles and place a “significant” financial burden on the NHS, HSJ has been told.

Under the vetting and barring scheme, employers are obliged to give the Independent Safeguarding Authority any information about individuals who may pose a risk to the vulnerable adults and children they work with.
 
From November, employers will be legally required to check whether staff are registered with the ISA.
But managers say it is unclear when they will be expected to refer individuals and how this information will be interpreted by the ISA.
 
NHS Employers director Sian Thomas said: “There’s huge scope for confusion about what the actual purpose is, how it fits with regulation generally and how it fits with an overall strategy for public protection.”
 
She said the costs for the NHS would be “significant”, potentially doubling the cost of carrying out Criminal Records Bureau checks - thought to be around £12m a year - and adding to managers’ workloads.
 
Draft guidance from the ISA says that, in deciding whether an individual should be referred, employers should consider whether there is any presence of “an impulsive, chaotic, unstable lifestyle”.
They should also take account of whether the person has “elective links with antisocial peers and/or associates” or suffers “severe emotional loneliness”.
 
Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence chief executive Harry Cayton said such “moral judgements” could potentially apply to someone going through a family breakdown.
 
He said: “Regulation should be proportionate and targeted. It should be transparent and fair. The general feeling is that the ISA is none of these things.”
 
He criticised the ISA’s ability to strike a worker off the register even if their professional regulator had decided they should be allowed to practice.
 
Mr Cayton said: “Given that we’re talking about having less rather than more regulation, how did we get ourselves into creating an entirely new quango with this level of interference into people’s lives?”
Managers in Partnership chief executive Jon Restell said his members were concerned the lack of clarity would lead to trusts adopting different practices.
 
A Department of Health spokesman said: “The new vetting and barring scheme is a measure designed to help prevent those who are known to be unsuitable from gaining access to children and vulnerable adults through their work in the NHS.
 
“It will also contribute to patient safety through sharing of information with regulatory bodies like the General Medical Council and the Care Quality Commission.”
 
 
  Reader's Comments
No comments posted yet
 
 
  Have Your Say
Name* :
E-Mail* :
Confirm E-Mail* :
Comments* :
Type the characters you see in the picture below*
Refresh Code
 
 
The content of this news story does not reflect the views of Parkhill. We will not publish readers’ email addresses. Comments on news stories are pre-moderated.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parkhill News  |  Events Listing
 
 
Supporting our Clients to Achieve Excellence
Copyright © 2010 Parkhill - All Rights Reserved
HFMA Corporate Partner BSI Registered